Tuesday, 30 June 2009
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- hope for a way forward
- RE: requirements for a web font container format?
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: gzip vs. mtx compression ratios
- Re: gzip vs. mtx compression ratios
- Re: gzip vs. mtx compression ratios
Monday, 29 June 2009
Tuesday, 30 June 2009
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: gzip vs. mtx compression ratios
- Re: gzip vs. mtx compression ratios
- Re: gzip vs. mtx compression ratios
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: restarting discussion
Monday, 29 June 2009
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: restarting discussion
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: restarting discussion
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: restarting discussion
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- restarting discussion
- Re: civility ruling, please RE: (fonts) MTX skepticism
- Re: civility ruling, please RE: (fonts) MTX skepticism
- Font mailing list <www-font@w3.org> reactivated
- gzip vs. mtx compression ratios