Thursday, 20 December 2001
- Uploading to jigedit via the command line
- test cases for rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema
- rdfms-difference-between-id-and-about
- Re: DATATYPING: second draft
- RE: Question about S
- P3P: A reification use case #2
- P3P: A reification use case #1
- Re: Aaron Visiting UK (was: Minutes 2001-12-14)
- Re: Aaron Visiting UK (was: Minutes 2001-12-14)
- Re: Aaron Visiting UK (was: Minutes 2001-12-14)
- Re: Aaron Visiting UK (was: Minutes 2001-12-14)
- Re: Aaron Visiting UK (was: Minutes 2001-12-14)
Wednesday, 19 December 2001
Tuesday, 18 December 2001
Monday, 17 December 2001
- Re: Reification
- RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) changes since Friday telecon
- Re: US spelling serialisation
- Re: US spelling serialisation
- Re: Minutes RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-12-07
- Re: Action 2001-11-16#9 (datatypes)
- RE: Question about S
- RE: DATATYPING: second draft
Sunday, 16 December 2001
- Re: RDF/XML Syntax Revised WD for review
- US spelling serialisation
- RE: RDF/XML Syntax Revised WD for review
- RE: RDF/XML Syntax Revised WD for review
- Test case rdfms-para196/test001
- rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr
- Re: Reification
- Minutes 2001-12-14
Friday, 14 December 2001
- Re: mt new draft
- Re: DATATYPING: second draft
- Re: DATATYPING: second draft
- RDF/XML Syntax Revised WD - Missing RDF names
- WebOnt member works around xml:lang
- RDF/XML Syntax Revised WD comments
- Re: Reification
- Re: Reification
- Reification
- ACTION 2001-12-07#3 : JosD, jjc to review Agenda item 14: Review test cases on para 196
- RE: DATATYPING: second draft
- RE: RDF/XML Syntax Revised WD for review
Thursday, 13 December 2001
- Re: RDF/XML Syntax Revised WD for review
- Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-12-14
- Re: Minutes RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-12-07
- Re: Minutes RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-12-07
- Action: 2001-12-07#5
- agenda late
- Minutes RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-12-07
- Re: Question about S
- Re: a test case for "literals must be self-evident"
Wednesday, 12 December 2001
- Question about S
- RE: Action 2001-11-16#9 (datatypes)
- Using rdf:ID to mean something
- Re: mt new draft
- mt new draft
- tech plenary registration open
- Re: DATATYPING: second draft
- Re: DATATYPING: second draft
Tuesday, 11 December 2001
- Re: unifying S-A and S-B
- Re: RDF/XML Syntax Revised WD for review
- Re: unifying S-A and S-B
- RDF/XML Syntax Revised WD for review
- RE: SYNTAX: serialization text - with naughty bit
- Re: I18N issues proposed issues and postponement
- Re: Provenance and reification
- SYNTAX: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-empty-property-elements
- Re: Action 2001-11-16#9 (datatypes)
- RE: Action 2001-11-16#9 (datatypes)
- manifest files for entailment tests
- Regrets for telecon friday
Monday, 10 December 2001
- Re: a test case for "literals must be self-evident"
- DATATYPING: second draft
- SYNTAX: RDF/XML WD progress and RELAX NG Schema
- Re: a test case for "literals must be self-evident"
- Re: The Problems with Fragments
- Re: a test case for "literals must be self-evident"
- RE: The Problems with Fragments
- Re: The Problems with Fragments
- RE: The Problems with Fragments
- The Problems with Fragments
Sunday, 9 December 2001
Saturday, 8 December 2001
- Datatyping goals (was: Action 2001-11-16#9 (datatypes))
- Re: Resolution for rdfms-fragments
- Links to some of my work
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot
Friday, 7 December 2001
- Re: comment on agenda item 9 (rdfs-transitive-subSubProperty)
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot
- RE: PL: how a perl programmer might do datatypes in RDF
- RE: Datatypes: J
- RE: PL: how a perl programmer might do datatypes in RDF
- Re: PL: how a perl programmer might do datatypes in RDF
- Re: Resolution for rdfms-fragments
- Re: comment on agenda item 9 (rdfs-transitive-subSubProperty)
- Re: comment on agenda item 9 (rdfs-transitive-subSubProperty)
- remember new telecon number
- Re: Resolution for rdfms-fragments
- Datatypes: J
- Loose end after WebOnt F2F
- RE: Resolution for rdfms-fragments
- Re: Resolution for rdfms-fragments
Thursday, 6 December 2001
Friday, 7 December 2001
- Re: Resolution for rdfms-fragments
- Re: Resolution for rdfms-fragments
- Re: Resolution for rdfms-fragments
- Re: Resolution for rdfms-fragments
- Re: In defense of S
- Re: how a perl programmer might do datatypes in RDF
- Re: how a perl programmer might do datatypes in RDF
- Re: Resolution for rdfms-fragments
Thursday, 6 December 2001
- Re: Resolution for rdfms-fragments
- Re: how a perl programmer might do datatypes in RDF
- Re: how a perl programmer might do datatypes in RDF
- Re: how a perl programmer might do datatypes in RDF
- Action 2001-11-16#9 (datatypes)
- Re: PL: how a perl programmer might do datatypes in RDF
- rdfms-aboutEach was: RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-12-07
- Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-12-07
- Re: regrets this friday
- regrets this friday
- holiday schedule
- New Number for telecons
Wednesday, 5 December 2001
Thursday, 6 December 2001
Wednesday, 5 December 2001
- Re: how a perl programmer might do datatypes in RDF
- RE: how a perl programmer might do datatypes in RDF
- Re: In defense of S
- ACTION 2001-11-30#5
- SYNTAX: serialization text - with naughty bit
- RE: In defense of S
- Resolution for rdfms-fragments