- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:10:24 -0000
- To: "Aaron Swartz" <me@aaronsw.com>, "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Again, another convincing post from Aaron ... > too? (Reading on it seems you do...) I'm speechless. Far from it, Aaron :-). > I recommend you read Roy Fielding's dissertation on REST, the architecture > of the Web[2] for more, at least section 6.2, which says (in part): I will do, before furthering this. > http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/evaluation.htm#sec_6_2 > On the other hand, RDF made many mistakes, has a low installed base, and > we're in charge of fixing it. So I don't see any reason not to. That's a fair point. I am not in any hurry to change either RFC 2396 or http, but these things are not eternal holy writ, and they will either change or be superceded; minor deviation from them is not necessarily a disaster. It then comes to be a value judgment whether the fragment thing is minor or not, and the extent to which it is a deviation that can be lived with or is perhaps positively desirable. Jeremy
Received on Monday, 10 December 2001 10:11:00 UTC