RE: RDF/XML Syntax Revised WD for review

Patrick:
> 10. Section 5.27, some discussion (possibly) should be provided for
> scenarios where there is a mingling of rdf:li and rdf:_n in the actual
> serialization. Should li-counter consider the explicit _n values?
> Should it ensure resume counting after the explicit _n value? Does
> the parser have to ensure no collisions or does it create a partial
> ordering?

These issues were all resolved before I joined the WG.
The rdf:li is a simply macro that starts at 1 for each element and
increments on each occurrence. Nothing clever.

I guess following the issues list gets to the discussion eventually.

Jeremy

Received on Sunday, 16 December 2001 11:45:26 UTC