- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:11:04 -0000
- To: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
*** sounds of back-pedalling *** > > 16: Issue rdfms-aboutEach > > It has been suggested: > > o the WG resolves to remove rdf:aboutEach from the language on > the grounds [..snip..] > > Alternatively, it has been suggested that we are straying beyond > the borders of our charter in removing it, and it can be useful. > > Propose, on the grounds that it does not seem to be harmful > that it should be retained. > > Given that I am alluded by the suggesting, I note that the charter's function has been further clarified to me (not in e-mail). I would be happy to go either way on this; and will concur with the majority. I think Dave made a good case for dropping it; but not bullet-proof. Graham later observed: [[[ Which makes me think that the criteria for dropping bad features should probably be less stringent than the criteria for adding "cool" features. ]]] which is a good point. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2001 11:14:10 UTC