- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 01:32:04 +0100
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
oh sorry, sorry, sorry, I had read the S-style proposal... of course, I agree for the P-style proposal, no test case needed ................ (I better go to bed now) [I like your reflexive property :-)] [..] > > I'm appealing to the fact that simple RDF documents don't > > even entail themselves. > > ... don't even ential themselves in the P-style proposal. did you have a testcase in mind? I'm still living under the assumption that asserted RDF documents should entail themselves... -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2001 19:32:13 UTC