Re: The Problems with Fragments

On 2001-12-10 9:10 AM, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> Again, another convincing post from Aaron ...

Thanks. I certainly appreciate your reasoned consideration of the issues.
 
>> too? (Reading on it seems you do...) I'm speechless.
> Far from it, Aaron :-).

Well, temporarily. ;-)
 
> I am not in any hurry to change either RFC 2396 or http, but these things
> are not eternal holy writ, and they will either change or be superceded;
> minor deviation from them is not necessarily a disaster. It then comes to be
> a value judgment whether the fragment thing is minor or not, and the extent
> to which it is a deviation that can be lived with or is perhaps positively
> desirable.

A very good point. 

-- 
[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]

Received on Monday, 10 December 2001 13:57:57 UTC