ISSUE-50 (dsig example typo): Missing < in closing DigestValue element tag [Errata-XML Signature]
ISSUE-49 (DerivedKeyType): No support for derived keys in XML Dsig, XML Enc [Rqmts (XML Signature and Canonicalization V Next Requirements)]
Agenda: Distributed meeting #5 2008-09-02
ISSUE-48 (DerivedKeyType): No support for derived keys in XML Dsig, XML Enc [Rqmts (XML Signature and Canonicalization V Next Requirements)]
- Re: ISSUE-48 (DerivedKeyType): No support for derived keys in XML Dsig, XML Enc [Rqmts (XML Signature and Canonicalization V Next Requirements)]
- Re: ISSUE-48 (DerivedKeyType): No support for derived keys in XML Dsig, XML Enc [Rqmts (XML Signature and Canonicalization V Next Requirements)]
Schema validation and signing/encryption
Comments on best practices revision
Agenda: Distributed meeting #4 2008-08-26 v2
ACTION-37: Write up scenario for simple sign
Please register for face-to-face meeting at TPAC 2008
Proposed revision to best practices comments provided by Brad
Security and XProc
Agenda: Distributed meeting #4 2008-08-26
Is arbitrary nodeset support a requirement for XML signatures?
Request for XML Processing Model use cases and requirements related to XML Security
Request for EXI use cases and requirements for XML Security
ACTION-45: Template for requirements document (and some initial input)
Agenda: Distributed meeting #3 2008-08-19 v2
Updated NIST drafts - randomized hashing; using approved hash algorithms; 198-1, HMAC
Complexity: listing and reviewing assumptions
Agenda: Distributed meeting #3 2008-08-19
[fwd] xml canonicalization - proposition - elimination of element name from end tag (from: amolspatil@gmail.com)
SAML simple sign
ISSUE-47 (XAdES Signature Reference): XAdES references latest XML Signature, depends on ds:Object and ds:KeyInfo [Sig (Design for XML Signature V Next)]
ACTION-28: liaison page updates
Meeting record: 2008-07-29
Meeting record: 2008-07-17
Meeting record: XML Security WG Weekly 2008-07-16
Agenda: Distributed meeting #2 2008-08-12 v2
Some strawman ideas for a minimum DSig profile
- Re: Some strawman ideas for a minimum DSig profile
- Re: Some strawman ideas for a minimum DSig profile
- Re: Some strawman ideas for a minimum DSig profile
- Re: Some strawman ideas for a minimum DSig profile