- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:04:40 -0400
- To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-exi@w3.org, XMLSec WG XMLSec W3C <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 21 August 2008 19:05:55 UTC
/ Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com> was heard to say:
| We are very interested in use cases and requirements from the XML
| Processing Model working group related to XML Security. Have you
| considered interactions with XML Signature and XML Encryption and
| have any resulting requirements (or use cases) that the XML Security
| WG should take into consideration?
You'll find one or two in our requirements document:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc-requirements/
| Would it make sense to consider XML Signature/Verification and
| Encryption/Decryption as steps in a pipeline? If so, would that
| impose requirements on XML Signature and XML Encryption, especially
| with regards to serialization or other assumptions?
I think it would make sense. I've never been able to find anyone to
explain what the inputs/outputs/options to such steps would be. Nor
have I ever found an XML signature toolkit that I could grok.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | 'I have done that,' says my memory. 'I
http://nwalsh.com/ | cannot have done that'--says my pride,
| and remains adamant. At last--memory
| yields.-- Nietzsche
Received on Thursday, 21 August 2008 19:05:55 UTC