- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:04:40 -0400
- To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-exi@w3.org, XMLSec WG XMLSec W3C <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 21 August 2008 19:05:55 UTC
/ Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com> was heard to say: | We are very interested in use cases and requirements from the XML | Processing Model working group related to XML Security. Have you | considered interactions with XML Signature and XML Encryption and | have any resulting requirements (or use cases) that the XML Security | WG should take into consideration? You'll find one or two in our requirements document: http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc-requirements/ | Would it make sense to consider XML Signature/Verification and | Encryption/Decryption as steps in a pipeline? If so, would that | impose requirements on XML Signature and XML Encryption, especially | with regards to serialization or other assumptions? I think it would make sense. I've never been able to find anyone to explain what the inputs/outputs/options to such steps would be. Nor have I ever found an XML signature toolkit that I could grok. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | 'I have done that,' says my memory. 'I http://nwalsh.com/ | cannot have done that'--says my pride, | and remains adamant. At last--memory | yields.-- Nietzsche
Received on Thursday, 21 August 2008 19:05:55 UTC