- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:36:47 +0200
- To: public-xmlsec@w3.org
fyi, this came in as a comment on Canonical XML. FWIW, I'll make sure that public-xmlsec-comments gets subscribed to the comment mailing lists for all the specs that we are chartered to deal with, to make it easier to follow them all. Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> ----- Forwarded message from Amol Patil <amolspatil@gmail.com> ----- From: Amol Patil <amolspatil@gmail.com> To: www-xml-canonicalization-comments@w3.org Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:14:06 +0100 Subject: xml canonicalization - proposition - elimination of element name from end tag List-Id: <www-xml-canonicalization-comments.w3.org> X-Spam-Level: Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/9744f7ad0808141214w680af2dcsb443c034d57d48e3@mail.gmail.com> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.6 Can xml canonicalization further be extended to eliminate the need of the name of the element in end tag / make it optional? Objective here is to reduce the size of overall xml content E.g. <RootElement> <FirstChildElement> <FirstChildOfFirstChildElement></> <SecondChildOfFirstChildElement></> </> <SecondChildElement></> </> There is a slight loss of readability here at the gain of reduced content size. Thanks ----- End forwarded message -----
Received on Friday, 15 August 2008 11:39:09 UTC