RE: Some strawman ideas for a minimum DSig profile from Scott Cantor on 2008-08-21 (public-xmlsec@w3.org from August 2008)

From: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:38:59 -0400
To: "'Thomas Roessler'" <tlr@w3.org>
Cc: "'Sean Mullan'" <Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM>, "'Kelvin Yiu'" <kelviny@exchange.microsoft.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <02b201c903c5$905526b0$b0ff7410$@2@osu.edu>

> I'm not so sure of that.  Implementing a tightly constrained profile
> of Signature turns out to be relatively easy (yes, I have done
> that), except for the canonicalization portion of things.

Well, yes, but that's the point. That's why I said if you don't do c14n,
sure, it's probably workable. Not terribly useful IMHO, but workable.

-- Scott

Received on Thursday, 21 August 2008 19:39:41 UTC