RE: [i60] Splitting semantics of namespace across multiple WS-A specs inhibits independent versioning
Agenda: 2005-06-02 F2F, Berlin, DE
Minutes of the 2005-05-23 teleconference
[i60] Splitting semantics of namespace across multiple WS-A specs inhibits independent versioning
Fault notation
LC77 - A proposal for wording
Proposal for issue i017, subissue b (AI from 2005-04-20)
Partial regrets
LC107 Discussion
Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-05-23
Re: Formal objection to the binding of [reference properties] in SOAP (resend, reference parameters instead of properties)
Formal objection to the binding of [reference properties] in SOAP (resend)
Agenda: 2005-06-02 F2F, Berlin, DE, US [DRAFT]
RE: LC Editorial Comment for WS-Addressing Core Specification
- RE: LC Editorial Comment for WS-Addressing Core Specification
- RE: LC Editorial Comment for WS-Addressing Core Specification
Editor question on lc64
RE: Formal objection to the binding of [reference properties] in SOAP
RE: Formal objection to the binding of [reference properties] in SOAP
Re: Formal objection to the binding of [reference properties] in SOAP
RE: Question regarding cardinality of [destination]
Re: Question regarding cardinality of [destination]
Minutes of the 2005-05-16 teleconference
Test matrix for reply rules
Formal objection to the binding of [reference properties] in SOAP
- Re: Formal objection to the binding of [reference properties] in SOAP
- Re: Formal objection to the binding of [reference properties] in SOAP
- Re: Formal objection to the binding of [reference properties] in SOAP
LC5 Discussion
LC5 Discussion (source endpoint utility, potential directions)
Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-05-16
Last Call Issues List updated
Minutes for the 2005-05-09 teleconference
Re: Language for Reference Parameters
Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-05-09
endpoint terminology confusion
Re: Mixed notation and indirect terminology for MAPs (SOAP, clarification)
Re: [lc34] Duplicate headers at the ultimate receiver (SOAP, substantive)
minutes of the 2005-05-02 teleconference
What does core section 3 actually require?
RE: [lc6][lc35]: Clarify conformance requirements (SOAP, substantive)
- RE: [lc6][lc35]: Clarify conformance requirements (SOAP, substantive)
- Re: [lc6][lc35]: Clarify conformance requirements (SOAP, substantive)
- RE: [lc6][lc35]: Clarify conformance requirements (SOAP, substantive)
- RE: [lc6][lc35]: Clarify conformance requirements (SOAP, substantive)