- From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 16:09:48 -0700
- To: "Nilo Mitra (TX/EUS)" <nilo.mitra@ericsson.com>
- CC: public-ws-addressing@w3.org, Rimas Rekasius <rimas@us.ibm.com>
My recollection is that we decided to do this for [address] property (in EPR) as well. Did I get this wrong? -Anish -- Nilo Mitra (TX/EUS) wrote: > Hi Rimas: > The WG considered your LC comment and has chosen to clarify that the message property > "[destination]: IRI (mandatory)" will be replaced by > "[destination]: IRI (1..1)" where (x..y) is short for minOccur=x and minOccur=y. > > In other words, there is only one [destination] property associated with a message. > > At the same time, the WG has also decided to make the same change to > "[action]: IRI (mandatory)" replacing it with > "[action]: IRI (1..1)". > > Please let the WG know if this does not address your concern - within two weeks, please, > Thanks, > Nilo > (on behalf of the WS-A WG) > > Nilo Mitra > Ericsson, Inc. > desk: +1 212-843-8451 > mobile: +1 516-476-7427 > > > >>When I read the Last Call Working Draft [1] of the Web Services Addressing >>1.0 - Core specification, I see that the cardinality indicator associated >>with the "[destination]" property in section 3. Message Addressing >>Properties [2] is "(mandatory)". Unfortunately, I do not see a definition >>of "(mandatory)" anywhere in the same document (I even checked RFC 2119 >>[3]). So, while I would doubt that anyone would argue about associating >>minOccurs=1 to the term, it is less clear what value of maxOccurs to >>associate. I can see arguments for both one and unbounded. So... >> >>(1) What did the authors intend for the meaning of "(mandatory)"? >> >>(2) If the intent was in fact maxOccurs=unbounded, could you help me to >>understand the use cases behind the intent? I have some ideas, but I am >>sure that the authors must have more. >> >>Thanks, >> >>Rimas V. Rekasius >>e-business Industry Standards Architect >>1-312-245-6775 (voice/FAX) >>1-773-934-2705 (cell phone) >> >> >>[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050331/ <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050331/> >>[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050331/#msgaddrprops <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-core-20050331/#msgaddrprops> >>[3] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt> > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2005 00:20:16 UTC