- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 18:59:56 +0100
- To: <dan@envoisolutions.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Dan, I share your concern. In essence there is no agreed upon Web Services Architecture, and not everyone agree that if one were to exist that it would even be 'a stack'. As a result it is left as an exercise to the reader to look at each specification in turn for a definition and use the context to work out what is meant when an overloaded term such as "endpoint", "binding" or "message exchange pattern" is being used. Of course this piecemeal approach doesn't help at all when specifications are combined, even those from the same stable, as the joint XMLP, WSA and WSD 'async' TF are currently finding out. I'm not sure that was very helpful! Paul -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org on behalf of Dan Diephouse Sent: Fri 5/6/2005 5:57 PM To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org Cc: Subject: endpoint terminology confusion I am becoming a little bit confused by WS-Terminology as of late, and I am hoping to clear up some confusion as to what exactly is meant by an "endpoint". I'm not sure if this list is the best place to ask, but I don't know of a better one at the moment.. In the WS-A proposal, an endpoint is defined as: "A Web service endpoint is a (referenceable) entity, processor, or resource where Web service messages can be targeted." And allow me to bring in the WSDL 2.0 definition for my question: "An endpoint associates a network address with a binding." I am confused about where the endpoint actually is in the stack. For example, SOAP is theoretically transport independent. I would define an endpoint as the transport agnostic part which processes the Envelope. Then I could theoretically share my soap service over many transports (http, smtp, etc). But I could see how an endpoint could also be defined in such a way that it only has one address? Or does WS-A not even care - just as long as its referencable? Or am I comparing apples to oranges with the above definitions? Cheers, - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions LLC http://netzooid.com
Received on Saturday, 7 May 2005 18:00:07 UTC