RE: [i60] Splitting semantics of namespace across multiple WS-A specs inhibits independent versioning from Sanjiva Weerawarana on 2005-05-30 (public-ws-addressing@w3.org from May 2005)

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@opensource.lk>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 23:47:40 +0600
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org, Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Message-Id: <1117475261.8152.136.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 15:55 -0700, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> No, it doesn't make sense.  The SOAP headers are defined in the wsa
> namespace (from the Core).  To have such closely related features as the
> SOAP fault codes associated with those headers defined in a different
> namespace is sure to cause way more confusion than it's worth.

Of course. However, I wasn't suggesting putting some of the SOAP header
elements in one NS and the faults in another .. the entire SOAP binding
of WS-A (including the MIHs, faults etc.) could easily be in its own NS
(of core NS + "/soap") right?

Sanjiva.

Received on Monday, 30 May 2005 17:48:19 UTC