Re: Question regarding cardinality of [destination]

On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 16:09 -0700, Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> My recollection is that we decided to do this for [address] property (in 
> EPR) as well.
> Did I get this wrong?

I believe we decided to disambiguate "mandatory" for [address],
[destination], and [action] but it hasn't been properly reflected in the
minutes. The comment from Rimas was only about the [destination]
property however [1].

Philippe
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/lc-issues/#lc39