Thursday, 28 March 2013
- Re: CSP: set of report URIs
- Re: CSP: set of report URIs
- Re: CSP: set of report URIs
- RE: CSP: set of report URIs
- Re: Restricting <base> URLS via CSP
Wednesday, 27 March 2013
- Re: CORS and wildcards.
- CORS and wildcards.
- Re: Include page http response code in CSP reports?
- Re: Include page http response code in CSP reports?
Tuesday, 26 March 2013
- Re: Include page http response code in CSP reports?
- Re: Include page http response code in CSP reports?
- Re: Restricting <base> URLS via CSP
- Re: Restricting <base> URLS via CSP
- Re: Restricting <base> URLS via CSP
- Re: Restricting <base> URLS via CSP
- Re: Restricting <base> URLS via CSP
- Re: [webappsec] new draft of UI Security available
Monday, 25 March 2013
- [webappsec] Minutes from 26-Feb teleconference available
- RE: [webappsec] new draft of UI Security available
- [webappsec] Agenda for 25-March-2013 Teleconference
- Re: [webappsec] new draft of UI Security available
- [webappsec] new draft of UI Security available
- Fwd: minor typo in CORS spec section 6.2?
- Re: Restricting <base> URLS via CSP
Saturday, 23 March 2013
Wednesday, 20 March 2013
- Re: CSP: set of report URIs
- Re: "form-action" status.
- Re: SecurityPolicyViolation DOM events.
- Re: SecurityPolicyViolation DOM events.
- "form-action" status.
- "source-file" vs "source-url"
Tuesday, 19 March 2013
- Include page http response code in CSP reports?
- Re: About script-nonce
- Re: CSP: set of report URIs
- Re: CSP: set of report URIs
- Re: CSP: set of report URIs
- Re: CSP: set of report URIs
- Re: CSP: set of report URIs
- Re: SecurityPolicyViolation DOM events.
- Re: Nonces/hashes in source expressions.
- Re: SecurityPolicyViolation DOM events.
- CSP: set of report URIs
- Re: SecurityPolicyViolation DOM events.
- SecurityPolicyViolation DOM events.
- Re: Nonces/hashes in source expressions.
Monday, 18 March 2013
- Re: webappsec-ISSUE-45 ('top-only'): Is 'top-only' worth preserving? [UI Security]
- [webappsec] FW: security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
- Re: webappsec-ISSUE-45 ('top-only'): Is 'top-only' worth preserving? [UI Security]
- RE: Nonces/hashes in source expressions.
- Re: Nonces/hashes in source expressions.
- RE: Nonces/hashes in source expressions.
- Re: Nonces/hashes in source expressions.
- RE: Nonces/hashes in source expressions.
- RE: Nonces/hashes in source expressions.
- RE: Nonces/hashes in source expressions.
- RE: Nonces/hashes in source expressions.
- RE: webappsec-ISSUE-45 ('top-only'): Is 'top-only' worth preserving? [UI Security]
- RE: Nonces/hashes in source expressions.
- RE: Nonces/hashes in source expressions.
- Nonces/hashes in source expressions.
- Re: CSP: error handling
- Re: CSP: error handling
- Re: Restricting <base> URLS via CSP
- Re: About script-nonce
- Re: CSP - matching a URI against a source expression with no scheme
- Re: Canonical paths
- Re: CSP: error handling
- Re: CSP - matching a URI against a source expression with no scheme
- Re: ISSUE-38: Discuss no-mixed-content directive
- Re: Heads up: proposal moving test repos to GitHub
- Re: Blank blocked-uris
- Re: Heads up: proposal moving test repos to GitHub
- Re: Heads up: proposal moving test repos to GitHub
Friday, 15 March 2013
- Re: security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
- Re: security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
Thursday, 14 March 2013
- Re: security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
- RE: security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
- CSP 1.0 copy&paste error
Wednesday, 13 March 2013
- please register for April face-to-face meeting
- CSP - matching a URI against a source expression with no scheme
- Re: webappsec-ISSUE-45 ('top-only'): Is 'top-only' worth preserving? [UI Security]
Tuesday, 12 March 2013
- RE: webappsec-ISSUE-45 ('top-only'): Is 'top-only' worth preserving? [UI Security]
- Re: webappsec-ISSUE-45 ('top-only'): Is 'top-only' worth preserving? [UI Security]
- Re: webappsec-ISSUE-45 ('top-only'): Is 'top-only' worth preserving? [UI Security]
- RE: webappsec-ISSUE-45 ('top-only'): Is 'top-only' worth preserving? [UI Security]
- Re: webappsec-ISSUE-45 ('top-only'): Is 'top-only' worth preserving? [UI Security]
- Re: URLs
- RE: URLs
- CSP: URLs
- CSP: error handling
Monday, 11 March 2013
- Re: webappsec-ISSUE-45 ('top-only'): Is 'top-only' worth preserving? [UI Security]
- Re: security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
- Re: webappsec-ISSUE-45 ('top-only'): Is 'top-only' worth preserving? [UI Security]
- [webappsec] Joel Weinberger's thesis on Analysis and Enforcement of Web Application Security Policies
Saturday, 9 March 2013
- Re: security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
- Re: webappsec-ISSUE-45 ('top-only'): Is 'top-only' worth preserving? [UI Security]
- Re: webappsec-ISSUE-45 ('top-only'): Is 'top-only' worth preserving? [UI Security]
Friday, 8 March 2013
- security model of Web Components, etc. - joint work with WebAppSec?
- Re: Canonical paths
- [webappsec] updated test VM available
Wednesday, 6 March 2013
- [webappsec] WG survey results
- RE: Certificate Revocation in Java
- Certificate Revocation in Java
- Re: ISSUE-38: Discuss no-mixed-content directive
- Re: ISSUE-38: Discuss no-mixed-content directive
- Re: Blank blocked-uris
- RE: [webappsec] Proposed text for jsonp directives
- Re: [webappsec] Proposed text for jsonp directives
Tuesday, 5 March 2013
- About script-nonce
- Re: webappsec-ISSUE-45 ('top-only'): Is 'top-only' worth preserving? [UI Security]
- webappsec-ISSUE-45 ('top-only'): Is 'top-only' worth preserving? [UI Security]
- [webappsec] new draft of UI Security available
Friday, 1 March 2013
- Canonical paths
- Re: CSP 1.0: Lax and strict CSS parsing rules
- Re: CSP 1.0: Lax and strict CSS parsing rules
- CSP 1.0: Lax and strict CSS parsing rules
- Re: Restricting <base> URLS via CSP
- Re: CORS: Requirement for HTTP 200 response on preflight is not web-compatible and doesn't seem to be interoperably implemented