- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 07:12:37 -0400
- To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, "dveditz@mozilla.com" <dveditz@mozilla.com>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, "Hill, Brad" <bhill@paypal-inc.com>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > In https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/content-security-policy/rev/0c7cb63e2e48, I've > stubbed out an initial pass at a SecurityPolicyViolationEvent interface. I'd > appreciate some feedback on both the content and the language used to > describe it. I tried to steal context from other specs, but none really did > exactly what I wanted. Ah well. Event.cancelable is already false by default so you don't have to say that. You also need to initialize all the other members. See http://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-event-fire-progress for an example. You also need to define an event constructor, see http://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/#interface-progressevent for an example. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2013 11:13:04 UTC