public-sml@w3.org from April 2008 by thread

RFC 2557 & SML-IF Kumar Pandit (Tuesday, 29 April)

[w3c sml][agenda][v2] 2008-05-01 SML Telecon John Arwe (Tuesday, 29 April)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-04-24 SML Teleconference John Arwe (Tuesday, 29 April)

[Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 24 April)

[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 24 April)

[Bug 5561] SML should define a Simple XLink Reference Scheme bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 24 April)

[Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 24 April)

[Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 24 April)

[Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 24 April)

[Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 24 April)

RE: [w3c sml][agenda][v2] 2008-04-24 SML Telecon Pratul Dublish (Thursday, 24 April)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-04-17 SML Teleconference Pratul Dublish (Thursday, 24 April)

[Bug 5341] EPR Reference Scheme Note bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 24 April)

[w3c sml] [EPR Note] Response to Comment #9, Issue 5431 Wilson, Kirk D (Thursday, 24 April)

[Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 24 April)

[Bug 5659] schemaComplete default value bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 24 April)

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-04-24 SML Telecon Pratul Dublish (Thursday, 24 April)

[Bug 5658] restore accidental change to smlif:identityType bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 24 April)

[Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 24 April)

Regrets for tomorrow - 4/24 Lynn, James (HP Software) (Wednesday, 23 April)

[Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 23 April)

[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 23 April)

[Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 23 April)

CFP: Mashups'08 @ ICSOC Nirmit Desai (Wednesday, 23 April)

draft response on bug 5562 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (Tuesday, 22 April)

[Bug 5656] Defining interoperability for user-defined reference schemes bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Tuesday, 22 April)

[Bug 5653] Final vocabulary clean-up bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Tuesday, 22 April)

[Bug 5341] EPR Reference Scheme Note bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Sunday, 20 April)

[Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5518] Why are rules allowed on both element declaration and type definitions bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5530] Use consistent form for MIT URI bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme' bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5527] Why is NCName optional? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5544] Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5562] SML should define an XHTML href Reference Scheme bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5561] SML should define a Simple XLink Reference Scheme bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 18 April)

[Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5475] Add acknowledgement sections to match SML spec bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5451] acknowledge past contributors bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5544] Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme' bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5645] remove spurious ns1 binding from appendix A and reflow line bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5587] Redundant text "interchange set" bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 17 April)

[Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 16 April)

[Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 16 April)

[Bug 5645] remove spurious ns1 binding from appendix A and reflow line bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 16 April)

Fw: [w3c sml][agenda][ver 2] 2008-04-17 SML telecon agenda John Arwe (Wednesday, 16 April)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-04-10 SML Teleconference John Arwe (Wednesday, 16 April)

[Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 16 April)

[Bug 5580] re-define SML URI scheme in terms of xs:anyURI type bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 16 April)

[Bug 5527] Why is NCName optional? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 16 April)

[Bug 5525] Confusing section names bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 16 April)

[Bug 5564] recursive definition of DerefExpr should be restored bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 16 April)

[Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 16 April)

[Bug 5451] acknowledge past contributors bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 16 April)

[Bug 5475] Add acknowledgement sections to match SML spec bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 16 April)

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-04-17 SML telecon agenda John Arwe (Tuesday, 15 April)

[Bug 5341] EPR Reference Scheme Note bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Monday, 14 April)

regrets for 4/24 John Arwe (Monday, 14 April)

[w3c sml] [EPR Note] New version of EPR Note Wilson, Kirk D (Monday, 14 April)

SML interop test plan Kumar Pandit (Friday, 11 April)

[Bug 5561] SML should define a Simple XLink Reference Scheme bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 11 April)

[Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme' bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5637] inconsistencies in language for rule attachment to schema components bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5341] EPR Reference Scheme Note bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[w3c sml] [EPR Note] New draft Wilson, Kirk D (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5530] Use consistent form for MIT URI bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5518] Why are rules allowed on both element declaration and type definitions bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5638] fix consistency of language for schematron constraints bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5637] inconsistencies in language for rule attachment to schema components bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme' bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 10 April)

[w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-03-31 ot 2008-04-02 Face to Face minutes John Arwe (Wednesday, 9 April)

[Bug 5506] Link name for 5.5 Schema Document Bindings bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Tuesday, 8 April)

[Bug 5475] Add acknowledgement sections to match SML spec bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Tuesday, 8 April)

[Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme' bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Tuesday, 8 April)

[Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Tuesday, 8 April)

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-04-10 SML Telecon Pratul Dublish (Saturday, 5 April)

[Bug 5518] Why are rules allowed on both element declaration and type definitions bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5390] How to handle non-embedded documents referenced by EPRs in SML-IF bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5390] How to handle non-embedded documents referenced by EPRs in SML-IF bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5600] request for additional examples bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5600] request for additional examples bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5600] request for additional examples bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5544] Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5527] Why is NCName optional? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5558] Definition & use of word Document bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5558] Definition & use of word Document bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5580] re-define SML URI scheme in terms of xs:anyURI type bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme' bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme' bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5561] SML should define a Simple XLink Reference Scheme bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5599] use of sml:acyclic bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5599] use of sml:acyclic bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5599] use of sml:acyclic bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5587] Redundant text "interchange set" bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 4 April)

[w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-03-27 Teleconference minutes Smith, Virginia (HP Software) (Wednesday, 2 April)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2008 21:37:17 UTC