- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:27:36 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- Cc:
pratul.dublish@microsoft.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Keywords|needsAgreement |decided
------- Comment #2 from pratul.dublish@microsoft.com 2008-03-31
23:17 -------
The change in status should cause email to be sent to the originator
of this
issue, to whom the following request is addressed.
Resolution in F2F meeting on 3/31 - the WG felt that this should be
considered
for the next version of SML. The SML URI Reference Scheme has been
defined to
ensure interoperability between implementations. To achieve interop
for bare
names, we would need to require PSVI or DTDs, or application-defined
identifiers. None of these are good for interop. Plus, it is not
clear that
bare names are defined for invalid XML documents, but we need to
allow invalid
documents in models. Of course, it is possible to define an
application/domain
specific SML Reference Scheme that supports bare names
Please review the changes adopted and let us know if you agree with this
resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and
changing
the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this
resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to
appeal the WG's
decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to
Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to
appeal the
decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to
Closed. If we
do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree
with the
WG decision.
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 13:24:26 UTC