- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:27:36 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- Cc:
pratul.dublish@microsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Keywords|needsAgreement |decided ------- Comment #2 from pratul.dublish@microsoft.com 2008-03-31 23:17 ------- The change in status should cause email to be sent to the originator of this issue, to whom the following request is addressed. Resolution in F2F meeting on 3/31 - the WG felt that this should be considered for the next version of SML. The SML URI Reference Scheme has been defined to ensure interoperability between implementations. To achieve interop for bare names, we would need to require PSVI or DTDs, or application-defined identifiers. None of these are good for interop. Plus, it is not clear that bare names are defined for invalid XML documents, but we need to allow invalid documents in models. Of course, it is possible to define an application/domain specific SML Reference Scheme that supports bare names Please review the changes adopted and let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the WG decision.
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 13:24:26 UTC