- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:28:12 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- Cc:
kumarp@microsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Keywords| |decided ------- Comment #1 from kumarp@microsoft.com 2008-03-29 07:26 ------- resolution (3/27 conf call): [1] The definition of the SML URI scheme is based on xs:anyURI as defined by XML schema 1.0 specification (which depends on RFC 2396 & RFC 2732). This is why we do not specifically refer to RFC 3986 in the definition of SML URI scheme. [2] The SML WG believes that the specification does not override any RFC 3986 mandated URI semantics. Can you please clarify what part of the specification overrides the RFC ? I'm changing its status accordingly. The change in status should cause email to be sent to the originator of this issue, to whom the following request is addressed. a. Please review the current LC text and let us know if you agree with #1 b. Please provide clarification on #2 Please indicate your response to (a) and (b) by adding a comment to the issue record. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the WG decision.
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 13:31:26 UTC