- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:03:47 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5561 ------- Comment #4 from ht@inf.ed.ac.uk 2008-04-18 13:03 ------- With respect, we already knew that anyone _could_ define a XLink reference scheme. The point was that if the WG doesn't include it in the spec., it won't get used because it won't be interoperable. I'm sorry the WG doesn't see it as an important selling point for SML, but I won't lie down in the road over this.
Received on Friday, 18 April 2008 13:04:18 UTC