- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:26:20 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5635 Summary: impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined Product: SML Version: LC Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core+Interchange Format AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: johnarwe@us.ibm.com QAContact: public-sml@w3.org IIRC we agreed to use the Schema 1.1 definitions for these terms, but I see no evidence of that decision in either spec. Indeed, I see no definition for either term in either spec. Should we add one, by value or by reference? Editors, note: SML contains a mix of "with -" and "without -" uses of these terms, in case that tickles anyone's consistency bone.
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2008 15:27:16 UTC