- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:30:33 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5638
Summary: fix consistency of language for schematron constraints
Product: SML
Version: LC
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Core
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: johnarwe@us.ibm.com
QAContact: public-sml@w3.org
LC Draft section 6.3.2 Schema Validity Rules, bullet 2 says "if B has
Schematron constraints defined on it then they are automatically copied to D
and unioned with the Schematron constraints defined on D."
these usages of "Schematron constraints defined on"
are in contrast to the bullets surrounding it, indeed w/ the rest of the
subsection, that carefully uses the well-defined {rules} notation.
The existing text would appear to introduce the possibility that Schematron
constraints might be attached to schema components other than via the
SML-defined {rules} schema component property, which I do not think was our
intent.
This bullet seems to be fully redundant with 6.3.1 bullet 3.a, so it might be a
simple matter of removing 6.3.2 bullet 2 entirely.
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2008 16:31:05 UTC