- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:30:33 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5638 Summary: fix consistency of language for schematron constraints Product: SML Version: LC Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: johnarwe@us.ibm.com QAContact: public-sml@w3.org LC Draft section 6.3.2 Schema Validity Rules, bullet 2 says "if B has Schematron constraints defined on it then they are automatically copied to D and unioned with the Schematron constraints defined on D." these usages of "Schematron constraints defined on" are in contrast to the bullets surrounding it, indeed w/ the rest of the subsection, that carefully uses the well-defined {rules} notation. The existing text would appear to introduce the possibility that Schematron constraints might be attached to schema components other than via the SML-defined {rules} schema component property, which I do not think was our intent. This bullet seems to be fully redundant with 6.3.1 bullet 3.a, so it might be a simple matter of removing 6.3.2 bullet 2 entirely.
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2008 16:31:05 UTC