public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org from February 2024 by author

Adrian Gschwend

• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Wednesday, 21 February)

Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)

• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly long meeting (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly long meeting (Friday, 9 February)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Wednesday, 7 February)

Andy Seaborne

• Re: abstract syntax and syntactic sugar (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Expansion of nested "occurrences" in Turtle (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Problems with unrestricted usage of syntax in option 3 (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: RDF-star semantics: option 3 (first DRAFT) (Monday, 19 February)
• Summary of Semantics TF (2024-02-16) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: Mapping Turtle syntax to triples. (Friday, 9 February)
• Mapping Turtle syntax to triples. (Wednesday, 7 February)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly long meeting (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly long meeting (Thursday, 1 February)

Franconi Enrico

• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: abstract syntax and syntactic sugar (Thursday, 29 February)
• Names we need (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Problems with unrestricted usage of syntax in option 3 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Problems with unrestricted usage of syntax in option 3 (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: transparency and entailment (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: transparency and entailment (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: transparency and entailment (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: transparency and entailment (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: RDF-star semantics: option 3 (first DRAFT) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: RDF-star semantics: option 3 (first DRAFT) (Friday, 16 February)
• Problems with unrestricted usage of syntax in option 3 (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: RDF-star semantics: option 3 (first DRAFT) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: RDF-star semantics: option 3 (first DRAFT) (Friday, 16 February)
• RDF-star semantics: option 3 (first DRAFT) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: Why Option 1 (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: Why Option 1 (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: Why Option 1 (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: summary of the Semantics TF discussion of last friday (Thursday, 1 February)

Gregory Williams

• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly long meeting (Thursday, 1 February)

Lassila, Ora

• Re: RDF-star semantics: option 3 (first DRAFT) (Friday, 16 February)

Olaf Hartig

• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Expansion of nested "occurrences" in Turtle (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Well-formedness for option 3 (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Thursday, 8 February)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: Well-formedness for option 3 (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: transparency and entailment (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: transparency and entailment (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: transparency and entailment (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: Problems with unrestricted usage of syntax in option 3 (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: RDF-star semantics: option 3 (first DRAFT) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: RDF-star semantics: option 3 (first DRAFT) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: RDF-star semantics: option 3 (first DRAFT) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: RDF-star semantics: option 3 (first DRAFT) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: Why Option 1 (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: Why Option 1 (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: Why Option 1 (Thursday, 15 February)
• transparency and entailment (Friday, 9 February)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• abstract syntax and syntactic sugar (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: Problems with unrestricted usage of syntax in option 3 (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: RDF-star semantics: option 3 (first DRAFT) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: RDF-star semantics: option 3 (first DRAFT) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: RDF-star semantics: option 3 (first DRAFT) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: RDF-star semantics: option 3 (first DRAFT) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: transparency and entailment (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: summary of the Semantics TF discussion of last friday (Monday, 5 February)

Souripriya Das

• nesting of triple-terms only if predicate in the outer triple-term is rdf:nameOf (Thursday, 29 February)

Thomas Lörtsch

• Re: transparency and entailment (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Why Option 1 (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: Why Option 1 (Thursday, 15 February)
• Why Option 1 (Tuesday, 13 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 29 February 2024 18:26:20 UTC