- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 09:17:28 -0500
- To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
On 2/17/24 04:10, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: [...] >> I suspect that with a well-formedness condition such as "tripleTerms can >> only appear as objects of /rdf:nameOf/ triples, which can have only >> tripleTerms as objects" we could avoid these problems. >> I strongly believe also that nobody is ever interested to write >> non-well-formed RDF graphs. > Agreed, but I'm not sure that everybody is ready to pay the computational cost > of enforcing well-formedness either -- again, for simple-entailment and SPARQL > processing. Some versions of well-formedness, like the one above, are simple and cheap and on-line. The computational cost of adding them is dwarfed by the computational cost of parsing triple terms. peter
Received on Saturday, 17 February 2024 14:17:33 UTC