- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:24:26 -0500
- To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
Presumably the bluish and redish parts in the definition of I+A should encompass not just the if conditions but the entire lines. There isn't anything to say how to split up triple terms and triple occurrences. It's probably easier to just say t.s is a tripleOccurrence id s p o and not bother with the accessors. It looks as if the triple occurrence semantics is missing an ID. And then that part could be replaced with [I+A](x) as appropriate. That is unless there is supposed to be a difference between s p o . o rdf:nameOf <<( a b c )>>. and s p <<o | a b c>> . peter
Received on Friday, 16 February 2024 15:24:31 UTC