Re: Why Option 1

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
• Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:11:22 -0500
• To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <8c17cf3a-6af7-482b-a1fb-b417cc9fab76@gmail.com>

The only real problem I see with option 1 is that it is easy to create 
Franken-reifications.   For example


<< :e | :s :p :o >> :x :y .
<< :e | :s1 :p1 :o1 >> :x :y .

The well-formedness condition to forbid this is not trivial

Option 2 is designed to eliminate this problem.  In option 2 well-formedness 
is easy to state and check.


peter

Received on Thursday, 15 February 2024 15:11:29 UTC