public-rdf-shapes@w3.org from March 2017 by date

Thursday, 30 March 2017

• Re: formal objection to advancing to candidate recommendation status Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 29 March 2017

• Re: ShEx 2.0 Candidate Release Gregg Kellogg
• RE: ShEx 2.0 Candidate Release Eric Prud'hommeaux

Tuesday, 28 March 2017

• Re: formal objection to advancing to candidate recommendation status Irene Polikoff

Friday, 24 March 2017

• Statement of Support for SHACL from Allotrope Foundation Vergis, James M.

Tuesday, 28 March 2017

• RE: ShEx 2.0 Candidate Release John Walker
• ShEx 2.0 Candidate Release Gregg Kellogg

Friday, 24 March 2017

• Re: formal objection to advancing to candidate recommendation status Irene Polikoff
• Re: formal objection to advancing to candidate recommendation status Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: formal objection to advancing to candidate recommendation status Irene Polikoff
• Re: formal objection to advancing to candidate recommendation status Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 23 March 2017

• Re: formal objection to advancing to candidate recommendation status Irene Polikoff
• formal objection to advancing to candidate recommendation status Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 22 March 2017

• Re: minor syntax fixes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: testing methodology Holger Knublauch
• Re: minor syntax fixes Holger Knublauch
• Re: closer examination of "possible route" Re: Comments on Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) W3C Editor's Draft 22 February 2017 Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 21 March 2017

• minor syntax fixes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: parameters for sh:QualifiedMinCountConstraintComponent and sh:QualifiedMaxCountConstraintComponent Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 20 March 2017

• Re: parameters for sh:QualifiedMinCountConstraintComponent and sh:QualifiedMaxCountConstraintComponent Holger Knublauch
• Re: strangeness of sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint Holger Knublauch
• Re: Formal objection on syntax checking in SHACL Irene Polikoff
• Re: Formal objection on syntax checking in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Formal objection on syntax checking in SHACL Irene Polikoff
• Re: Formal objection on syntax checking in SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• parameters for sh:QualifiedMinCountConstraintComponent and sh:QualifiedMaxCountConstraintComponent Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• strangeness of sh:qualifiedValueShapesDisjoint Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• withdrawing formal objection on closing of ISSUE-92 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Using SHACL Pano Maria
• The Importance and Application of SHACL in Industry Smith, Tim

Sunday, 19 March 2017

• Re: example for disjoint qualified value shapes Holger Knublauch

Saturday, 18 March 2017

• Re: Comparison with object-oriented validation, such as Java's Bean Validation Timothy Armstrong

Friday, 17 March 2017

• Re: example for disjoint qualified value shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Comparison with object-oriented validation, such as Java's Bean Validation Holger Knublauch
• Re: validation results and validation reports Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 16 March 2017

• Comparison with object-oriented validation, such as Java's Bean Validation Timothy Armstrong
• Re: Review of SHACL document (2) Olivier Corby
• Re: Review of SHACL document (2) Holger Knublauch
• Re: example for disjoint qualified value shapes Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 15 March 2017

• example for disjoint qualified value shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: validation results and validation reports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: central problem with test suite Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: central problem with test suite Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: central problem with test suite Holger Knublauch
• Re: central problem with test suite Holger Knublauch
• Re: validation results and validation reports Irene Polikoff

Tuesday, 14 March 2017

• validation results and validation reports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• testing methodology Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: central problem with test suite Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: central problem with test suite Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Fwd: Announcement: Springer Nature SciGraph - Public datasets release Hammond, Tony
• Re: central problem with test suite Holger Knublauch

Monday, 13 March 2017

• Re: central problem with test suite Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 12 March 2017

• Re: central problem with test suite Holger Knublauch

Saturday, 11 March 2017

• Re: central problem with test suite Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: central problem with test suite Irene Polikoff
• central problem with test suite Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 10 March 2017

• Re: notice of potential formal objection Irene Polikoff
• another problem with pre-binding Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: notice of non-implementation Irene Polikoff
• Re: Quick "last call" before CR for Data Shapes' SHACL Irene Polikoff
• notice of potential formal objection Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Quick "last call" before CR for Data Shapes' SHACL Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 9 March 2017

• Re: Test Suite progress Holger Knublauch
• Re: Quick "last call" before CR for Data Shapes' SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Test Suite progress Olivier Corby
• Re: Quick "last call" before CR for Data Shapes' SHACL Olivier Corby
• closer examination of "possible route" Re: Comments on Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) W3C Editor's Draft 22 February 2017 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 8 March 2017

• Re: FW: SHACL (RDF Shapes) coming up for Candidate Recommendation Holger Knublauch
• FW: SHACL (RDF Shapes) coming up for Candidate Recommendation Dave McComb
• RE: Question on Handling of Ill-formed Shapes Graphs Svensson, Lars

Tuesday, 7 March 2017

• continuing problems with pre-binding Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Quick "last call" before CR for Data Shapes' SHACL Thomas Francart

Monday, 6 March 2017

• Re: Formal objection to removing features from node shapes Irene Polikoff
• Re: Formal objection to removing features from node shapes Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 3 March 2017

• Quick "last call" before CR for Data Shapes' SHACL Sandro Hawke
• Re: Comments on Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) W3C Editor's Draft 22 February 2017 Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 2 March 2017

• SHACL Playground (in JavaScript) Holger Knublauch
• Re: Formal objection on closing of ISSUE-92 Holger Knublauch
• Re: $this in Aggregations Holger Knublauch

Wednesday, 1 March 2017

• Re: Formal objection to removing features from node shapes Irene Polikoff

Last message date: Thursday, 30 March 2017 14:24:22 UTC