- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:50:23 -0700
- To: Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
Having something wrong in a non-normative part of a standard is not as bad as having something wrong in a normative part of a standard, but I don't see how having something wrong in a non-normative part of a standard is anything other than harmful. peter On 03/22/2017 05:51 PM, Irene Polikoff wrote: > Peter, > > I assume that you are referring to the non-normative SPARQL queries that are > included in the document. > > Since they are clearly marked as non-normative, what harm do you see in their > inclusion? > > Irene >> On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:13 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider >> <pfpschneider@gmail.com <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Pre-binding is also a central part of >> non-normative descriptions of targets and constraints in SHACL Core so >> problems with pre-binding also affect the rest of the SHACL document. >
Received on Friday, 24 March 2017 00:50:59 UTC