- From: Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:30:45 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
Do you have any suggestions? > On Mar 11, 2017, at 7:56 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > > The testing process is not adequate to check for compliance of validation > reports. All that it takes to see this is to notice that there are multiple > compliant non-isomorphic validation reports for when the data graph conforms > to the shapes graph. Something more flexible than RDF graph isomorphism is > needed as the central operation of determining whether the actual validation > report is complaint with the requirements in the SHACL document. > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Nuance Communications > > > On 03/08/2017 11:52 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: >> I made some progress defining the test suite. >> >> http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-test-suite/ >> >> Please take a look esp at the lower sections on how the comparison of expected >> and actual results happens. >> >> This document was started by Jose who has since left the WG and since I have >> no idea whether this still reflects his thinking I have inserted my name to >> the list of editors. This does not mean that I am particularly keen on >> "owning" this work or this document. It may not look too good if the primary >> editor and implementer also defines the test cases. If anyone more neutral >> wants to step up owning this task, I'd be more than happy to take a back seat. >> Of course I will submit and edit tests though >> >> If this process looks reasonable, I suggest we start working on the actual >> tests "soon", e.g. after reaching CR. >> >> Holger >> >> >
Received on Saturday, 11 March 2017 17:31:19 UTC