- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:49:45 -0800
- To: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
I'm not sure how the process for filing a formal objection against a transition request decision would work, so I'm stating here my intentions. The current definition of pre-binding in SHACL has multiple known problems. As pre-binding is currently such a central part of SHACL, SHACL should not proceed to candidate recommendation unless these problems are fixed. If there is a decision to proceed to candidate recommendation status without fixing these problems I intend to file a formal objection as soon as practically possible after I learn about the transition request. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Received on Friday, 10 March 2017 12:50:20 UTC