W3C home
Mailing lists
Public
public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from February 2006
by thread
34 messages
:
Starting
Thursday, 2 February 2006 17:23:15 UTC,
Ending
Saturday, 25 February 2006 09:37:13 UTC
Sort by
:
thread
author
date
subject
Mail actions
:
mail a new topic
Help
:
how to use the archives
search the archives
RDF DAWG face to face meeting 2-3 Mar 2006
Eric Prud'hommeaux
(Saturday, 25 February)
Comments on Feb 20 Working Draft of SPARQL
Reto Krummenacher
(Friday, 24 February)
Typos in SPARQL
Olivier Corby
(Friday, 24 February)
SPARQL Dataset Graph Pattern
Olivier Corby
(Thursday, 23 February)
Some typos in SPARQL spec
Arjohn Kampman
(Thursday, 23 February)
comments on Section 1 and Section 2 of SPARQL Query Language for RDF
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
(Wednesday, 22 February)
comment on wording at beginning of SPARQL Query Language for RDF
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
(Wednesday, 22 February)
Re: comment on wording at beginning of SPARQL Query Language for RDF
Dan Connolly
(Wednesday, 22 February)
Re: comment on wording at beginning of SPARQL Query Language for RDF
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
(Wednesday, 22 February)
Re: comment on wording at beginning of SPARQL Query Language for RDF
Dan Connolly
(Wednesday, 22 February)
SPARQL: arguments for built-in calls to generic?
Arjohn Kampman
(Wednesday, 22 February)
DAWG disjunction objection
Dave Beckett
(Monday, 20 February)
[closed]: SPARQL: BASE IRI resolution [test-todo]
Dan Connolly
(Monday, 20 February)
Re: [closed] Re: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases [test-todo]
Dan Connolly
(Monday, 20 February)
Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL Protocol: suboptimal examples
Dan Connolly
(Monday, 20 February)
Re: langMatches wording in sparql query 2005-11-23 and tests [OK?]
Dan Connolly
(Friday, 17 February)
Re: langMatches wording in sparql query 2005-11-23 and tests [OK?]
Dave Beckett
(Saturday, 18 February)
Re: langMatches wording in sparql query 2005-11-23 and tests [closed] [test-todo]
Dan Connolly
(Monday, 20 February)
Re: sparql describe - options?! [OK?]
Dan Connolly
(Friday, 17 February)
Re: sparql describe - options?! [OK?]
Richard Newman
(Friday, 17 February)
Re: sparql describe - options?! [OK?]
Patrick Stickler
(Tuesday, 21 February)
Re: Example Errors (sections 8, 9, 10) [OK?]
Dan Connolly
(Friday, 17 February)
Re: SPARQL: W3C QA Guidelines conformance [closed]
Dan Connolly
(Friday, 17 February)
Re: Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch."
Dan Connolly
(Friday, 17 February)
RE: Belated comments on SPARQL Protocol for RDF 25 January 2006 LC WD
Jonathan Marsh
(Friday, 17 February)
Re: Comments on SPARQL Query Language for RDF (21 July 2005 version) [OK?]
Dan Connolly
(Friday, 10 February)
Re: Specifying RDF Datasets [closed]
Dan Connolly
(Friday, 10 February)
Re: editorial comments on SPARQL Query Lanuage for RDF [OK?]
Seaborne, Andy
(Friday, 10 February)
[closed]: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples
Dan Connolly
(Thursday, 9 February)
Re: SPARQL: Backslashes in string literals [closed]
Dan Connolly
(Thursday, 9 February)
Re: Questions on the Sparql [OK?]
Seaborne, Andy
(Thursday, 9 February)
Re: SPARQL Comments (Personal) [OK?]
Seaborne, Andy
(Wednesday, 8 February)
Re: URI serialization issues [OK?]
Dan Connolly
(Thursday, 2 February)
Re: Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation [closed]
Dan Connolly
(Thursday, 2 February)
Last message date
: Saturday, 25 February 2006 09:37:13 UTC