- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:07:25 -0600
- To: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 23:31 -0800, Dave Beckett wrote: > The langMatches definition: [...] > I think this is backwards, as an example following uses '*' in the > second argument position, and so do the test cases I was puzzling over - > q-langMatches-[1-4].rq quite. fixed in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#func-langMatches 1.643 of 2006/02/17 23:04:04 Please let us know if this comment addresses your questions to your satisfaction. > I'm also unsure about the tests as q-langMatches-3 returns an answer > with no language but the definition above says * only matches non-empty > languages. q-langMatch-4 which is the negative of that, is similarly > affected. I hope it's OK if I leave your question on the test materials aside, for now. We'll be going over them in CR. > The tests also rely that LANG(non-literals) returns "" although it's not > so explicit in the text to me as LANG() is only defined for literals, > including in the table "SPARQL Unary Operators". I was returning a type > error taking anything not allowed as forbidden. > > Dave -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 17 February 2006 23:07:28 UTC