Saturday, 25 February 2006
Friday, 24 February 2006
Thursday, 23 February 2006
Wednesday, 22 February 2006
- comments on Section 1 and Section 2 of SPARQL Query Language for RDF
- Re: comment on wording at beginning of SPARQL Query Language for RDF
- Re: comment on wording at beginning of SPARQL Query Language for RDF
- Re: comment on wording at beginning of SPARQL Query Language for RDF
- comment on wording at beginning of SPARQL Query Language for RDF
- SPARQL: arguments for built-in calls to generic?
Tuesday, 21 February 2006
Monday, 20 February 2006
- DAWG disjunction objection
- [closed]: SPARQL: BASE IRI resolution [test-todo]
- Re: [closed] Re: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases [test-todo]
- Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL Protocol: suboptimal examples
- Re: langMatches wording in sparql query 2005-11-23 and tests [closed] [test-todo]
Saturday, 18 February 2006
Friday, 17 February 2006
- Re: sparql describe - options?! [OK?]
- Re: langMatches wording in sparql query 2005-11-23 and tests [OK?]
- Re: sparql describe - options?! [OK?]
- Re: Example Errors (sections 8, 9, 10) [OK?]
- Re: SPARQL: W3C QA Guidelines conformance [closed]
- Re: Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch."
- RE: Belated comments on SPARQL Protocol for RDF 25 January 2006 LC WD
Friday, 10 February 2006
- Re: Comments on SPARQL Query Language for RDF (21 July 2005 version) [OK?]
- Re: Specifying RDF Datasets [closed]
- Re: editorial comments on SPARQL Query Lanuage for RDF [OK?]
Thursday, 9 February 2006
- [closed]: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples
- Re: SPARQL: Backslashes in string literals [closed]
- Re: Questions on the Sparql [OK?]