On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 15:32 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > I just started reading > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20060220/ > > and was brought up short by the poor wording at its very beginning: > > An RDF graph is a set of triples; each triple consists of a subject, a > predicate and an object. This is defined in RDF Concepts and Abstract > Syntax [CONCEPTS]. These triples can come from a variety of sources. Perhaps I have just read it too many times, but I can't see anything wrong with that wording. > Surely better wording can be generated, particularly at this important part of > the document. Do you have any improvements to suggest? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 21:04:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:22 UTC