Re: comment on wording at beginning of SPARQL Query Language for RDF

On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 15:32 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> I just started reading
> 
> 	http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20060220/
> 
> and was brought up short by the poor wording at its very beginning:
> 
> 	An RDF graph is a set of triples; each triple consists of a subject, a
> 	predicate and an object. This is defined in RDF Concepts and Abstract
> 	Syntax [CONCEPTS]. These triples can come from a variety of sources.


Perhaps I have just read it too many times, but I can't see anything
wrong with that wording.

> Surely better wording can be generated, particularly at this important part of
> the document.

Do you have any improvements to suggest?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E