Re: SPARQL: W3C QA Guidelines conformance [closed]

On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 02:49 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> >[CNF]
> Editorial remarks: rather than _x_ this should probably use <em> or
> something like that; the other appendices have a full stop after the
> letter, so the title should probably be "B. Conformance", the title
> of Appendix A. is "SPARQL Grammar" not "grammar", similar for appendix
> E; the references to the other appendices should be links.

fixed in 1.642  2006/02/17 21:56:56 

> The references section still has the RFC2119 reference that's never
> referred to in the text, the usual "the key words ... in RFC 2119"
> text seems to be missing. I assume that's editorial aswell.

RFC2119 cite struck.

> I didn't review the draft against SpecGL in detail, but with these
> editorial nits fixed, I think I'm happy with this. Thanks.

You're quite welcome.

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Friday, 17 February 2006 21:58:53 UTC