- From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:01:51 -0800
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
When I was a DAWG working group member, I objected to disjunction: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#disjunction on the grounds of implementation cost. At this time over a year later, there are people who have implemented it, so I'd withdraw my personal objection to it (I am not speaking for my current or former employers). However, I've still not found the time in the last year to implement it myself in Rasqal, or can see that changing anytime soon. Other parts of SPARQL are higher priority to me. Dave
Received on Monday, 20 February 2006 21:01:59 UTC