Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL Protocol: suboptimal examples

On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 11:55 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 11:36 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
> >>  If the RDF DAWG wants to use Notation3 in a W3C Technical
> >> Report and requires a media type for Notation3 for that, it's the  
> >> WG's
> >> responsibility to do what's necessary so this can be done in  
> >> accordance
> >> with RFC 4288 and the TAG's finding on internet media types, both of
> >> which seem quite clear that use of unregistered and experimental  
> >> media
> >> types is discouraged.

I think TimBL filled out the form to start the registration procedure,
but I haven't managed to find a public record of it.

Meanwhile, I filed a cwm bug:
N3 media type registration Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 31 January)

Suppose we accept as a CR exit criterion that text/rdf+n3 be registered;
would that be an acceptable response to your comment, Bjoern?

I just double-checked the relevant process documentation this
seems consistent with it.

FYI, I added this to the CR exit criteria in the CR request that I'm

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 20 February 2006 15:51:48 UTC