On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 11:55 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote: > On Jan 31, 2006, at 11:36 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: [...] > >> If the RDF DAWG wants to use Notation3 in a W3C Technical > >> Report and requires a media type for Notation3 for that, it's the > >> WG's > >> responsibility to do what's necessary so this can be done in > >> accordance > >> with RFC 4288 and the TAG's finding on internet media types, both of > >> which seem quite clear that use of unregistered and experimental > >> media > >> types is discouraged. I think TimBL filled out the form to start the registration procedure, but I haven't managed to find a public record of it. Meanwhile, I filed a cwm bug: N3 media type registration Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 31 January) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cwm-bugs/2006Jan/0004.html Suppose we accept as a CR exit criterion that text/rdf+n3 be registered; would that be an acceptable response to your comment, Bjoern? I just double-checked the relevant process documentation this seems consistent with it. http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype FYI, I added this to the CR exit criteria in the CR request that I'm drafting... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/crq349 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Monday, 20 February 2006 15:51:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:22 UTC