public-owl-comments@w3.org from March 2009 by subject

[LC Response #2] to Jan Wielemaker, Re: Triples and OWL2

[LC response] To Andrea Splendiani

[LC response] To Bijan Parsia

[LC Response] To Chimezie Ogbuji Re: Comments for OWL2-RL profile

[LC Response] To Chris Welty Re: non-disjoint value spaces for numeric datatypes

[LC Response] To Chris Welty Re: RIF perspective on supported datatypes

[LC response] To Frank van Harmelen

[LC Response] To Frank van Harmelen Re: General comments on OWL2 design

[LC response] To Guus Schreiber

[LC response] To Ivan Herman- LC comment on OWL 2 QL

[LC Response] To Jacco van Ossenbruggen Re: Confusion about the status of the XML Serialisation syntax

[LC response] To Jan Hladik

[LC response] To Jeremy Caroll

[LC response] To Jeremy Carroll

[LC Response] To Jeremy Rogers (Re: OWL2 annotations)

[LC response] To Jim Hendler

[LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments)

[LC Response] To Jonas von Malottki Re: OWL2

[LC response] To Jonathan Rees

[LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: Editorial comments on RDF-based semantics

[LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: The two imports closure definitions disagree

[LC response] To Jos de Bruijn

[LC Response] To Jos de Bruijn Re: a few comments about the OWL 2 drafts

[LC Response] To Jos de Bruijn Re: why restrict the set of datatypes in OWL 2 RL profile?

[LC response] To Kaarel Kaljurand

[LC Response] To M. Scott Marshall Re: OWL2 comments

[LC response] To Marijke Keet

[LC Response] To Marijke Keet Re: haskey clarification

[LC response] To Marko Luther

[LC response] To Matthew Horridge

[LC response] To Maurizio Lenzerini, Diego Calvanese, Giuseppe De Giacomo, Riccardo Rosati - LC comment on OWL 2 QL

[LC response] To Michael Schneider

[LC response] To Michael Schneider Re: Clarify what it means that the value in a facet-value pair (F v) is an "arbitrary object"

[LC response] To Michael Schneider Re: LC Comment: "lexical value" vs. "lexical form"

[LC Response] To Mike Smith - Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern

[LC response] To Ralf Moeller

[LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2

[LC response] To Roman Kontchakov & Michael Zakharyaschev- LC comment on OWL 2 QL

[LC response] To SWD WG

[LC response] To Tom Morris

[Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: Editorial comments on RDF-based semantics

Comment received and ackowledged

OWL Last Call comment

patterns for searchable representation of quantifiable objects

Re 2: [LC Response] to Jan Wielemaker, Re: Triples and OWL2

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2009 23:15:14 UTC