[LC response] To Marko Luther

Dear Marco,

Thank you for your comment
      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/ 
2009Jan/0048.html>
on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.

We acknowledge the importance of implementations and tool support  
and, indeed, implementations supporting OWL 2 will be a condition for  
the standardization of OWL 2. It is, however, not in the scope of  
this working group to standardize communications protocols [1].

On the other hand, we are creating a collection of test cases [2] and  
would welcome help in the generation and testing of these cases. So,  
if you think that OWLlink would be a suitable tool for testing our  
test cases, then it would be great if you could coordinate with the  
working group, for example Markus Kroetzsch and Mike Smith.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/06/OWLCharter.html

[2] http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/ 
OWL_2_Test_Cases

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl- 
comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your  
acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied  
with the working group's response to your comment.

Regards,
Uli Sattler
p.p. Ian Horrocks
on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group

Received on Monday, 16 March 2009 17:42:52 UTC