Re: [LC response] To Jos de Bruijn

Dear Ian,

Thank you for the response.

The proposed change in the conformance specification should address my
concern.


Best, Jos


Ian Horrocks wrote:
> Dear Jos,
> 
> Thank you for your comment
>     
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Feb/0007.html>
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
> 
> Thank you for pointing this out. The intention is that all OWL profiles
> can be interpreted according to either the Direct semantics or the
> RDF-based semantics. Thus an OWL RL implementation using the Direct
> semantics would be conformant. We have revised the text in the
> Conformance specification to make this clear.
> 
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to
> <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should
> suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you
> are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.
> 
> Regards,
> Ian Horrocks
> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
> 
> 

-- 
+43 1 58801 18470        debruijn@inf.unibz.it

Jos de Bruijn,        http://www.debruijn.net/
----------------------------------------------
Many would be cowards if they had courage
enough.
  - Thomas Fuller

Received on Sunday, 8 March 2009 12:01:37 UTC