W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > March 2009

[LC response] To Michael Schneider

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:23:45 +0000
Message-Id: <B0D417A9-D90C-451B-9472-01B58743F76F@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
Dear Michael,

Thank you for your comment
on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.

Thank you for pointing out this problem. The Syntactic Conformance  
section of the Conformance and Test Cases document (see [1]) has been  
revised to be clearer in general and to rectify this error in  
particular -- it now explicitly refers to RDF/XML documents and says:

"An OWL 2 DL ontology document is an OWL 2 Full ontology document  
that can be successfully parsed using the canonical parsing process  
as defined in the OWL 2 Syntax specification [OWL 2 Specification]  
and the procedure for mapping from RDF graphs to the structural  
specification described in the OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs [OWL 2  
Mapping to RDF Graphs] to produce an instance of the OWL 2 ontology  
class satisfying all of the restrictions described in Section 3 of  
the OWL 2 Syntax specification [OWL 2 Specification]."

Note that in response to other last call comments Section 3 of the  
OWL 2 Syntax specification is being revised to ensure that it lists  
all the restrictions that apply to OWL DL ontology structures.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ 

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl- 
comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your  
acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied  
with the working group's response to your comment.

Ian Horrocks
on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2009 12:32:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:40:21 UTC