Re: [LC response] To Marijke Keet

Dear Ian,

That it is only mentioned in the example and not cf. conceptual data 
modelling is not ideal, but better no change at all. At this late stage 
I will not push further and so I'm satisfied with the working group's 
response.

Best regards,
Marijke

Ian Horrocks ha scritto:
> Dear Marijke,
>
> Thank you for your comment
>      
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Mar/0014.html> 
>
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
>
> We changed the text in Section 9.5 of the OWL 2 Structural 
> Specification and Functional-Style Syntax [1] to talk about (lack of) 
> functionality and to include an example.
>
> Does this adequately address your concerns?
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax#Keys
>
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to 
> <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should 
> suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you 
> are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.
>
> Regards,
> Ian Horrocks
> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
>
>

Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 13:43:21 UTC