[LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: The two imports closure definitions disagree from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2009-03-04 (public-owl-comments@w3.org from March 2009)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:54:35 -0500 (EST)
To: jar@creativecommons.org
Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <20090304.165435.162216732.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

Dear Jonathan,

Thank you for your message
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Feb/0000.html>
on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.

The RDF Semantics document was not at last call.  It has recently been
changed so that imports is no longer a semantic issue.  The editor of
the RDF Semantics document will be working with you to improve the
related presentation issues. 

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to
<mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should
suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you
are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment. 

Regards,
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group

Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2009 21:54:23 UTC