public-owl-comments@w3.org from January 2009 by subject

[FWD: Re: Upcoming deadline for comments on last call OWL 2 specification]

[LC response] To Alan Rector

[SPAM] Re: [SPAM] [ontolog-forum] Last call documents for OWL 2 specificationavailable - review and comments solicited

a few comments about the OWL 2 drafts

A few typos in the examples in the syntax document

Additional non-RDF-XML syntax considered harmful

Anonymous classes as values for annotations

Clarify what it means that the value in a facet-value pair (F v) is an "arbitrary object"

Comment on NewFeatures Negative[Object,Data]PropertyAssertion

Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern

comment on Use Case #3 of http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-new-features/

Comment regarding OWL 2 Structural Specification

Comments for OWL2-RL profile

Comments on "rdf:text A Datatype for Internationalized Text"

comments on imports

Comments on OWL 2

Comments on OWL 2 Candidate Recommendations

Comments on OWL 2 Last Call Drafts

comments on OWL 2 QL

Comments on OWL2

Confusing usage of the name "OWL2"

Editorial comments on RDF-based semantics

Fwd: Certification of OWL 2 tools via OWLlink?

Fwd: OWL2

Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments

Fwd: Support for OWL 2

Fwd: support for owl2

General comments on OWL2 design

haskey clarification

LC comment from Andrea Splendiani

LC Comment: "lexical value" vs. "lexical form"

Martin Duerst: Re: please review "text/owl-functional" and "application/owl+xml"

More OWL 2 Document comments

new treatment of anonymous individual really necessary?

non-disjoint value spaces for numeric datatypes

our intended use of OWL 2

OWL 2 Comments: Please prioritize range restrictions for cardinality and for numerics

OWL 2 Document comments

OWL 2 roadmap

OWL Too?

OWL2

OWL2 annotations

OWL2 comments

OWL2 Feedback from Lilly

Problems with sameness and namedness of individuals

procedural comment on OWL2 Full semantics

Request for explicit URI's for language profiles

RIF perspective on supported datatypes

Spelling mistake in OWL2 New Features and Rationale §2.4.1

Structures, elements of the structural specification, and equivalence

Suggestions to improve the introduction to 'Structural Specification'

TopQuadrant last call comments

TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC

Triples and OWL2

why restrict the set of datatypes in OWL 2 RL profile?

Last message date: Saturday, 31 January 2009 19:59:52 UTC