- From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:44:19 +0100
- To: public-owl-comments@w3.org
- CC: Susie M Stephens <STEPHENS_SUSIE_M@LILLY.COM>
Susie Stephens wrote:
> 1. Personally, I feel OWL2 is a wrap-up of different recent efforts in the
> OWL community from different research forces, such as EL from Dresden, QL
> and RL from Manchester/Oxford. Given the usage of OWL 1.0 is quite limited
> in the industry compare to the usage of RDF, it may cost many extra efforts
> and is very challenging to teach system developers to use new OWL2, in
> particular, identifying different subsets of OWL2 for developers with
> limited logic background.
Personally, I feel the same.
(see my other messages to the list for more technical comments by our group)
Frank.
----
--
Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh
Working on the Large Knowledge Collider http://www.LarKC.eu
Received on Saturday, 24 January 2009 09:44:55 UTC