Saturday, 31 January 2009
Friday, 30 January 2009
Thursday, 29 January 2009
Wednesday, 28 January 2009
Tuesday, 27 January 2009
- Fwd: OWL2
- RE: Comments on "rdf:text A Datatype for Internationalized Text"
- Comment on NewFeatures Negative[Object,Data]PropertyAssertion
Monday, 26 January 2009
- Re: Comments on "rdf:text A Datatype for Internationalized Text"
- RE: OWL Too?
- procedural comment on OWL2 Full semantics
- OWL Too?
- Problems with sameness and namedness of individuals
- TopQuadrant response to OWL2 LC
- Comment regarding OWL 2 Structural Specification
- Re: Additional non-RDF-XML syntax considered harmful
- Fwd: Certification of OWL 2 tools via OWLlink?
Sunday, 25 January 2009
- Structures, elements of the structural specification, and equivalence
- LC comment from Andrea Splendiani
Saturday, 24 January 2009
- A few typos in the examples in the syntax document
- Re: OWL2 Feedback from Lilly
- Re: OWL2 Feedback from Lilly
- Re: OWL2 Feedback from Lilly
- TopQuadrant last call comments
- Suggestions to improve the introduction to 'Structural Specification'
- Comments for OWL2-RL profile
Friday, 23 January 2009
- Request for explicit URI's for language profiles
- new treatment of anonymous individual really necessary?
- Additional non-RDF-XML syntax considered harmful
- Confusing usage of the name "OWL2"
- General comments on OWL2 design
- OWL2 Feedback from Lilly
- RIF perspective on supported datatypes
- non-disjoint value spaces for numeric datatypes
- More OWL 2 Document comments
- Re: OWL2 comments
- OWL2 annotations
- OWL2 comments
- OWL2
- Comments on OWL 2 Last Call Drafts
- a few comments about the OWL 2 drafts
- OWL 2 Comments: Please prioritize range restrictions for cardinality and for numerics
- why restrict the set of datatypes in OWL 2 RL profile?
- comment on Use Case #3 of http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-new-features/
- Comments on OWL 2
- comments on OWL 2 QL
- Comments on OWL2
- OWL 2 Document comments
Thursday, 22 January 2009
- Re: Comments on OWL 2 Last Call Drafts
- [FWD: Re: Upcoming deadline for comments on last call OWL 2 specification]
- Comments on OWL 2 Candidate Recommendations
- our intended use of OWL 2
Wednesday, 21 January 2009
- Re: Spelling mistake in OWL2 New Features and Rationale §2.4.1
- Comments on OWL 2 Last Call Drafts
- Spelling mistake in OWL2 New Features and Rationale §2.4.1
Wednesday, 14 January 2009
Thursday, 8 January 2009
- LC Comment: "lexical value" vs. "lexical form"
- Clarify what it means that the value in a facet-value pair (F v) is an "arbitrary object"
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] [ontolog-forum] Last call documents for OWL 2 specificationavailable - review and comments solicited
Wednesday, 7 January 2009
- Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments
- Martin Duerst: Re: please review "text/owl-functional" and "application/owl+xml"
Tuesday, 6 January 2009
- Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern
- Comments on "rdf:text A Datatype for Internationalized Text"