- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:50:09 +0100
- To: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 15:50:30 UTC
Hello, The set of datatypes in OWL 2 RL is a subset of the set of OWL 2 datatypes. The rationale given for this restriction is that the intersection of any two values spaces should be empty or infinite in order to obtain the desired computational properties. I believe this is not correct. In OWL 2 RL one does not need to consider unnamed individuals. Since IRIs cannot be mapped to objects in value spaces and the interpretation of every literal is fixed, finite (intersections of) value spaces do not require reasoning by case. Therefore, the language keeps the desired computational properties, even with finite datatypes. It seems to me that the list of datatypes in OWL 2 RL needs to be extended or better motivated. Best, Jos
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 15:50:30 UTC