public-owl-comments@w3.org from February 2009 by subject

[LC Response] To Frank van Harmelen Re: OWL2 Feedback from Lilly

• Frank van Harmelen (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 19 February)

[LC Response] To Frank van Harmelen Re: Request for explicit URI's for language profiles

• Frank van Harmelen (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 19 February)

[LC Response] to Jan Wielemaker, Re: Triples and OWL2

• Ivan Herman (Thursday, 19 February)

[LC response] To Jim Hendler

• Bijan Parsia (Wednesday, 25 February)

[LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments)

• Bijan Parsia (Thursday, 19 February)
• Jim Hendler (Thursday, 19 February)
• Bijan Parsia (Thursday, 19 February)
• Jim Hendler (Thursday, 19 February)
• Bijan Parsia (Thursday, 19 February)
• Jim Hendler (Thursday, 19 February)
• Bijan Parsia (Wednesday, 18 February)

[LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: octets vs. characters

• Jonathan Rees (Thursday, 19 February)
• Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 19 February)

[LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: Problems with sameness and namedness of individuals

• Jonathan Rees (Thursday, 19 February)
• Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 19 February)

[LC response] To Martin Duerst (was Re: Martin Duerst: Re: please review "text/owl-functional" and "application/owl+xml")

• Martin Duerst (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Bijan Parsia (Wednesday, 18 February)

[LC Response] To Mike Smith - Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern

• Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 4 February)

[LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2

• Michael Schneider (Friday, 20 February)

[LC Response] To Susie Stephens Re: OWL2 Feedback from Lilly

• Susie M Stephens (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 19 February)

[LC Response] To Taylor Cowan

• Taylor Cowan (Friday, 27 February)
• Frank van Harmelen (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Ivan Herman (Wednesday, 25 February)

[LC response] To Timothy Redmond

• Timothy Redmond (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Bijan Parsia (Tuesday, 24 February)

[LC Response] to UvA (Re: new treatment of anonymous individual really necessary?)

• Ivan Herman (Thursday, 26 February)
• Frank van Harmelen (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Ivan Herman (Wednesday, 25 February)

Confusion about the status of the XML Serialisation syntax

• Jacco van Ossenbruggen (Thursday, 12 February)

Fwd: OWL2

• Jonas von Malottki (Monday, 9 February)

Fwd: soutien OWL2

• Christine Golbreich (Tuesday, 10 February)

Fwd: Support for OWL2

• Ian Horrocks (Monday, 9 February)

LC comments SWD Working Group

• Guus Schreiber (Wednesday, 11 February)

minor error in conformance doc

• Jeremy Carroll (Friday, 6 February)

new treatment of anonymous individual really necessary?

• Frank van Harmelen (Wednesday, 18 February)

octets vs. characters

• Jonathan Rees (Sunday, 1 February)

OWL 2 RL semantics?

• Jos de Bruijn (Thursday, 5 February)

OWL 2 roadmap

• Jonathan Rees (Sunday, 1 February)

OWL Too?

• Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) (Monday, 2 February)

OWL2 and RDF

• Taylor Cowan (Monday, 2 February)

Please define import closure of an ontology *document*

• Jonathan Rees (Tuesday, 24 February)

Request for strongly typed functional style syntax

• Matthew Horridge (Tuesday, 3 February)

The two imports closure definitions disagree

• Jonathan Rees (Sunday, 1 February)

Last message date: Friday, 27 February 2009 17:40:11 UTC